3 Points to Consider

  • How does one prove something is “factual”? Would there need to be agreement about what a fact IS and agreement about what prove IS?
  • What is claimed to be reason for authority vs what could be reason? Why expect the so-called authorities to tell you what actually grants jurisdiction vs offering a red herring for you to ask for evidence of?
  • Could there be a false dichotomy going around that if one fails to claim to be in The State, fails to claim to be or own the name, ID, BC etc, fails to claim to be a citizen, resident etc, claims to own $, account, car, house etc that one MUST be claiming to NOT be or own name, ID, BC etc claiming to NOT be defendant etc?
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s