Hearsay of a Controversy existing?

Could the claimant (often the state of …) and you be the only two capable of providing firsthand testimony(/”knowledge”?) that there’s a controversy concerning you? Why be a witness against the self?

Could “it” be as simple as using questions to bring to light the fact that there’s no firsthand knowledge of a controversy even existing, much less concerning you?

Without firsthand testimony from the claimant to confirm that a controversy even exists, much less has anything to do with me, would it make sense to discharge this matter?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s